HIGH COURT Q & A

What are the proceedings Mau Whenua has filed in the High Court?

Mau Whenua has filed proceedings in the High Court seeking orders to bring three blocks of land located at Shelly Bay formerly owned by the Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust (PNBST) back into iwi ownership.

In early July 2017 Tai-Kuru Limited Partnership (TKLP), an entity controlled by the trustees of the PNBST (the Trustees) owned four blocks of land located at Shelly Bay (the Shelly Bay Properties).  In July 2017 TKLP sold three of those blocks of land to Shelly Bay Investments Limited (SBIL) a company controlled by Mr Ian Cassels and granted SBIL or another entity controlled by Mr Cassels an option to purchase the fourth block of land. 

Mau Whenua considers that these transactions were a breach of trust by the Trustees and that SBIL knew or ought to have known it was acquiring trust property in breach of trust.  Mau Whenua argues that in these circumstances SBIL should not be allowed to retain ownership of the Shelly Bay Properties and that those properties should be returned to iwi ownership.

Why were these transactions a breach of trust?

The PNBST Trust Deed requires a major transaction – defined as including a transaction involving the sale or disposition of over half of the value of the Trust Fund – to be approved by a special resolution of the PNBST members.

 

In February 2016 the Trustees proposed selling the Shelly Bay Properties to The Wellington Company Limited, another company controlled by Mr Ian Cassels, for $11.4 million.   The Trustees acknowledged that this proposed sale was a major transaction, as it involved a sale of over half of the value of the Trust Fund, and therefore required approval of 75% of PNBST’s members.

The Trustees advanced a special resolution to approve that sale.  That special resolution failed with only 50% of voting members being in favour – far from the required 75%.

Following the failed special resolution, the Trustees started publicly discussing a joint venture with a company controlled by Mr Cassels to develop the land at Shelly Bay.  Despite requests, the Trustees refused to provide any details on the joint venture arrangement to its members or kaumātua.

In October 2016 members passed a resolution at the PNBST Annual General Meeting that the Trustees stop all activity regarding Shelly Bay and reports back to its members to let them decide what happens with the Shelly Bay Properties.

Despite this, in July 2017 the Trustees entered into agreements with SBIL to sell three blocks of land at Shelly Bay and grant an option to SBIL or another entity controlled by Mr Cassels to purchase the fourth block of land.

The Trustees did not advise its members of these sales. While the Trustees publicly discussed a joint venture with SBIL to develop Shelly Bay, it was understood until recently that the four blocks of land comprising the Shelly Bay Properties were still owned by iwi. 

Who are the defendants to the High Court proceedings?

There are, essentially, two sets of defendants to the High Court proceedings:

(a).   the current trustees of the PNBST and those former trustees who were trustees at

 the  time of  the sale of the Shelly Bay Properties to SBIL; and

 

(b).   SBIL.

The proceeding seeks:

(a).          a declaration that the trustees and former trustees committed a breach of trust  when they sold the three blocks of land at Shelly Bay to SBIL and granted SBIL an option to purchase  the fourth block of land without a special resolution of Taranaki  Whānui members; and

 

(b).    an order cancelling the registration of the transfer of the three blocks of land to SBIL. 

 

The effect of this order is that the sale to SBIL would be cancelled, returning the land to iwi ownership.

What orders are sought in the High Court proceedings?

How long will it take for the High Court to issue a judgment?

The process is expected to take around 12 to 18 months to reach a hearing, with a judgment expected around three months after the hearing.  However, the precise timings will depend on a number of factors including court availability, witness availability, the complexity of the evidence and any applications the Court must deal with relating to the process to the hearing.

Can the Shelly Bay Development be progressed before the High Court issues its judgment?

Mau Whenua has lodged caveats against the titles of the Shelly Bay Properties in issue with Land Information New Zealand.   The caveats, once registered against the titles, will prevent SBIL taking steps to subdivide or otherwise transfer the Shelly Bay Properties to another person and Tai-Kuru Limited Partnership transferring the land it owns to SBIL (or any other person) until the High Court has issued its judgment.  

What about other property transactions the trustees of the PNBST have engaged in with Ian Cassels and other developers?  Are those transactions also part of the High Court proceeding?

The High Court proceeding only challenges the sale of the three Shelly Bay Properties and the option to purchase the fourth Shelly Bay Property entered into between SBIL and TKLP/the Trustees.

Mau Whenua is still considering whether there are claims in respect of other property transactions engaged in by the Trustees, but any such claims are not part of the current High Court proceedings.

How can you help?

Mau Whenua is actively fundraising to pay legal costs associated with the litigation. 

There are two ways its members and other supporters can contribute:

1 .   Donations can be made via Mau Whenua’s Give a Little page. 

2 . Mau Whenua is accepting donations directly.  A regular automatic payment can also be set up.

ABOUT US >

Mau Whenua Inc. Society shall represent ALL New Zealanders who oppose the 'current' development proposal at Shelly Bay.

© 2019 Mau Whenua | Save Shelley Bay
Proudly created by DHC Events Ltd